Even before the nullification issue had been settled,
another controversy occurred that challenged Jackson's leadership. It
concerned the rechartering of the second Bank of the United States.
The first bank had been established in 1791, under Alexander Hamilton's
guidance, and had been chartered for a 20-year period. Though the government
held some of its stock, it was not a government bank; rather, the bank
was a private corporation with profits passing to its stockholders.
It had been designed to stabilize the currency and stimulate trade;
but it was resented by Westerners and working people who believed, along
with Senator Thomas Hart Benton of Missouri, that it was a "monster"
granting special favors to a few powerful men. When its charter expired
in 1811, it was not renewed.
For the next few years, the banking business was in
the hands of state-chartered banks, which issued currency in excessive
amounts, creating great confusion and fueling inflation. It became increasingly
clear that state banks could not provide the country with a uniform
currency, and in 1816 a second Bank of the United States, similar to
the first, was again chartered for 20 years.
From its inception, the second Bank was unpopular in
the newer states and territories, and with less prosperous people everywhere.
Opponents claimed the bank possessed a virtual monopoly over the country's
credit and currency, and reiterated that it represented the interests
of the wealthy few. On the whole, the bank was well managed and rendered
valuable service; but Jackson, elected as a popular champion against
it, vetoed a bill to recharter the bank. In his message to Congress,
he denounced monopoly and special privilege, saying that "our rich men
have not been content with equal protection and equal benefits, but
have besought us to make them richer by act of Congress." The effort
to override the veto failed.
In the election campaign that followed, the bank question
caused a fundamental division between the merchant, manufacturing and
financial interests (generally creditors who favored tight money and
high interest rates), and the laboring and agrarian elements, who were
often in debt to banks and therefore favored an increased money supply
and lower interest rates. The outcome was an enthusiastic endorsement
of "Jacksonism." Jackson saw his reelection in 1832 as a popular mandate
to crush the bank irrevocably -- and found a ready-made weapon in a
provision of the bank's charter authorizing removal of public funds.
In September 1833 he ordered that no more government money be deposited
in the bank, and that the money already in its custody be gradually
withdrawn in the ordinary course of meeting the expenses of government.
Carefully selected state banks, stringently restricted, were provided
as a substitute. For the next generation the United States would get
by on a relatively unregulated state banking system, which helped fuel
westward expansion through cheap credit but kept the nation vulnerable
to periodic panics. It wasn't until the Civil War that the United States
chartered a national banking system.